next up previous 78
Next: First step-Turning the table into a spiketrum
Up: Flux calibration
Previous: The final step


Published standards

Published standards fall into two distinct classes; they are similar, but differ sufficiently that Figaro provides different sets of functions for dealing with them.

Older, brighter, standards such as those in Oke & Gunn4 are published as tables giving wavelengths and the corresponding flux densities calculated by measuring the observed flux over a range of wavelength centred on the tabulated wavelength. (This is the significance of the .Z.BANDWIDTH value shown in the section on standard files.) These tabulated values therefore correspond exactly to what the observed spectrum should look like, even in the presence of absorption features.

More recently, Filippenko & Greenstein5 have published tables for fainter stars where they fit a continuum to the observed data and tabulate the value of this continuum at various wavelength values. These values will not therefore represent the actual observed data in regions where there is absorption, and the concept of a `bandwidth' does not apply.



next up previous 78
Next: First step-Turning the table into a spiketrum
Up: Flux calibration
Previous: The final step

FIGARO A general data reduction system
Starlink User Note 86
Keith Shortridge, Horst Meyerdierks,
Malcolm Currie, Martin Clayton, Jon Lockley,
Anne Charles, Clive Davenhall,
Mark Taylor, Tim Ash, Tim Wilkins, Dave Axon,
John Palmer, Anthony Holloway and
Vito Graffagnino
2004 February 17
E-mail:ussc@star.rl.ac.uk

Copyright © 2008 Science and Technology Facilities Council